Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: general_re
Causality is simply not a universal requirement,

I am confounded. 'Splain, please.

395 posted on 10/01/2005 10:51:59 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (THIS IS WAR AND I MEAN TO WIN IT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies ]


To: Amos the Prophet
I mean that there is no requirement that all events have some sort of antecedent. There is no logical reason that all effects must have causes, and indeed it's impossible to prove that effects must necessarily have causes. And, in fact, there are instances where there are completely uncaused events, such as the radioactive decay of an atom I talked about before.

Therefore, to suggest that uncaused causes are somehow illogical or irrational has a little problem with empirical falsification - in fact, uncaused causes happen all the time. We don't usually see them in our everyday lives, which is what makes the concept rather foreign to us, but the phenomenon is real and it really exists.

399 posted on 10/01/2005 11:01:54 AM PDT by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson