Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mlc9852
Yeah, it was gradual, over millions of years, yet no transitional ape/human fossils.

What on earth are you talking about? "Archaic" Homo Sapiens, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo antecessor, Homo rudolfensis, Homo habilis, Australopithecus garhi, Australopithecus robustus, Australopithecus bosei, Australopithecus aethiopicus, Australopithecus bahrelghazali, Australopithecus africanus, Australopithecus afarensis, Kenyathropus playops, Australopithecus anamensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Orrorin tugenensis... you mean other than these there are no transitional species?

I'm not sure I understand.

80 posted on 09/30/2005 10:05:53 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Alter Kaker

Those are interpretations of fossils found. If it was so definite, we wouldn't have these threads. But you know that.


99 posted on 09/30/2005 10:24:09 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson