Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ichneumon
Wow. Your response was the exact typical response I expected. While we're at it, tell me, what are the resonable possible other options? Try not to let your bias for evolution cloud your thinking. And try to avoid arguing a negative.
47 posted on 09/30/2005 11:57:32 AM PDT by ConservativeBamaFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeBamaFan
How about Lamarkian evolution? It was a "reasonable" possible other option. It was tested in the Lab and rejected because it didn't work. Rejected by the Western societies, that is. Communists embraced Lamarkian evolution, and just as they ignored all evidence that their crazy economic system didn't work, they also ignored all evidence that Lamarkian evolution didn't work. The liked Lamarkian evolution because it provided a mechanism for "Homo Sapiens" (the thinking man) to turn into "Homo Communista" (the unthinking man). Stalin's pet "peasant scientist" Lysenko even denied that there were chromosomes, genes or DNA.

So your in real good company with those who like to ignore and reject real science to pursue their ideological dogma.
48 posted on 09/30/2005 12:04:09 PM PDT by Mylo ( scientific discovery is also an occasion of worship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson