Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bkwells

A concientious objector is opposed to all war, not just a specific one. Very lame excuse. If he wants to oppose Iraq than so be it but he must be responsible for his actions.


32 posted on 09/29/2005 11:37:52 AM PDT by fizziwig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fizziwig
A conscientious objector would not have joined an all-volunteer ARMED FORCE.

Many who legitimately object to war have the smarts not to join when there is a remote chance they'll be called on to fight.

I'd be willing to wager a donut the dude's not as passive as he makes out to be if one were to flail him silly.
42 posted on 09/29/2005 11:48:09 AM PDT by azhenfud (He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: fizziwig
A concientious objector is opposed to all war, not just a specific one.

Exactly ... and traditionally, non-combat billets, including front-line medical service, were assigned to those with consistent pacifist religious convictions who had been drafted into the military.

A devout Quaker or Mennonite wouldn't engage in fistfighting over girlfriends, either. I wonder if this machito makes a habit of principled nonresistence in his personal life? (/sarcasm)

It appears that an attempt is being made to expand the definition of "conscientious objection" so that it can be used to reject any assignment a service member doesn't like. Bad idea!

50 posted on 09/29/2005 11:53:12 AM PDT by Tax-chick (When bad things happen, conservatives get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson