“No, it means you thought wrong period. Bit's of my list? No, because they wouldn't be on it if they weren't creationists.”
Wrong period? What are you talking about? The scientists metmom mentioned are pre-Darwin, and are noted as such on your list. They are the ‘bits’ I take issue with.
The post-Darwin bits of your list are acceptable to support your point.
But by the way, ‘believing in a creator’ and ‘believing in Evolution’ are not mutually exculsive.
But by the way, ‘believing in a creator’ and ‘believing in Evolution’ are not mutually exculsive.
Isn't that what's called "ID"?