[Nathan Zachary]

A fossel has never been found which proves anything evolutionist claim.
Further, carbon dating is seriously flawed. A "guess" based on a flawed formula.

[ml1954]

A fossel has never been found which proves anything evolutionist claim. Further, carbon dating is seriously flawed. A "guess" based on a flawed formula.

I can tell from this response we have no basis for further discussion.

[RadioAstronomer]

Further, carbon dating is seriously flawed. A "guess" based on a flawed formula.

In a single word - Flapdoodle!

[doc30]

Finding fossils is a test of evolution. Fossils finds are distinct in that certain types correspond to certain times in a predictable pattern. When you find a fossil, evolution is tested based upon what the fossil is and when it formed. Thus far, no fossil find has contradicted the observed pattern. If you were to find a human fossil with a dinoisaur fossil, then evolution would fall. Thus far, it hasn't happened.

Another test is genetics. Evolution was conceived before genetics was even known. With genetics, hereditary relationships between species can and is observed. There are many more such predictive tests. Look at the scientific literature if you want over a million pages of such information.

[Coyoteman]

Further, carbon dating is seriously flawed.

I use Carbon-14 dating all the time. Could you please elaborate on the flaws? For example, the date I received a few months ago of cal. 7140? What's wrong with that one?