To: Coyoteman
I've found his reply:
What about carbon dating? By Ken Ham, Jonathan Sarfati, and Carl Wieland. A sample:
In summary, the carbon-14 method, when corrected for the effects of the flood, can give useful results, but needs to be applied carefully. It does not give dates of millions of years and when corrected properly fits well with the biblical flood.
How many howlers can you find in those two sentences?
344 posted on
09/29/2005 5:19:33 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Disclaimer -- this information may be legally false in Kansas.)
To: PatrickHenry
Festival of Howlers & Trolls placemarker
To: Coyoteman
351 posted on
09/29/2005 5:43:24 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Disclaimer -- this information may be legally false in Kansas.)
To: PatrickHenry
In summary, the carbon-14 method, when corrected for the effects of the flood, can give useful results, but needs to be applied carefully. It does not give dates of millions of years and when corrected properly fits well with the biblical flood. What's truly astonishing is that there are several true statements in it. It can give useful results. It needs to be applied carefully. It does not give dates of millions of years.
To: PatrickHenry
In summary, the carbon-14 method, when corrected for the effects of the flood... Well, it's particularly easy to correct for The Flood. An affine transformation yields the most reliable results:
T_correct = A * T_measured + B
where A=1 and B=0 as determined by examining antediluvian pine cones.
383 posted on
09/29/2005 7:39:31 PM PDT by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson