To: wyattearp
You mean, like stealing your nic?
Seriously, I posted my source way back at the beginning of the thread, Further, I never claimed the statement to be my own words.
Finally, regardless of where I get my source information from, it doesn't discredit the valid observations (what evolutionist claim is "science") of it. The FACT is, Carbon dating is flawed, very inaccurate, and used only to bend time to fit the ridiculous theory of evolutionists
To: Nathan Zachary
You mean, like stealing your nic? Didn't steal it. It's been mine since I was a kid.
281 posted on
09/29/2005 3:02:17 PM PDT by
wyattearp
(The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
To: Nathan Zachary
he FACT is, Carbon dating is flawed, very inaccurate, and used only to bend time to fit the ridiculous theory of evolutionists Did you even read my post #211 to you? I spent over an hour on it and it looks like your comments are identical to what you were saying before I posted.
Have you had time to read it or are you ignoring it?
282 posted on
09/29/2005 3:02:41 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(New tagline coming soon)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson