[Nathan Zachary]

Taxonomy, Transitional Forms, and the Fossil Record.

wild guesses, grouping >fossals< that don't belong together prove nothing. Many of these mistakes have been discovered. The Hobbit bones is in reference to what was an alleged new species of human which evolutionists named Homo floresiensis which turned out to be the remains of an ordinary sickly kid, a modern human who had a brain-shrinking disorder called microcephaly. Much hoopla was made about this discovery, which is yet another of a long list of frauds.

[Dimensio]

wild guesses, grouping >fossals< that don't belong together prove nothing.

Asserting that taxonomy lists are "wild guesses" does not amount to a refutation.

The Hobbit bones is in reference to what was an alleged new species of human which evolutionists named Homo floresiensis which turned out to be the remains of an ordinary sickly kid, a modern human who had a brain-shrinking disorder called microcephaly.

Got a reference for this?

Much hoopla was made about this discovery, which is yet another of a long list of frauds.

Can you demonstrate that a "long list of frauds" actually exists? Piltdown Man is the only actual fraud of which I'm aware in the history of fossil presentations.