An orbit is a nothing more than an object falling around another object. Both Kepler and Newton came up with a set of laws that describe this phenomenon.
Keplers 3 laws of planetary motion:
1) The orbit of a planet is an ellipse with the sun at one of the foci.
2) The line drawn between a planet and the sun sweep out equal areas in equal times.
3) The square of the periods of the planets is proportional to the cubes of their mean distance from the sun.
So what is that telling us? In a nutshell, all orbits are ellipses, the close to the body you are orbiting the faster you go (e.g. if you have a highly elliptical orbit the satellites velocity will increase as it approaches the object being orbited and decrease as it get further away), and the further away an orbit is, the slower the object moves.
These laws not only apply to planets, but to any orbiting body.
Note: Super geek alert #1:
For an orbiting body this is not entirely correct. It turns out that both bodies end up orbiting a common center of mass of the two-body system. However, for satellites, the mass of the Earth is so much greater than the mass of the satellite, the effective center of mass is the center of the Earth.
Newtons three laws (and law of gravitation)
1) The first law states that every object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless compelled to change its state by the action of an external force. (Commonly known as inertia)
2) The second law states that force is equal to the change in momentum (MV) per change in time. (For a constant mass, force equals mass times acceleration F=ma)
3) The third law states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. In other words, if an object exerts a force on another object, a resulting equal force is exerted back on the original object.
Newtons law of gravitation states that any two bodies attract one another with a force proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
Note: Super geek alert #2:
Actual observed positions did not quite match the predictions under classical Newtonian physics. Albert Einstein later solved this discrepancy with his General Theory of Relativity. In November of 1919, using a solar eclipse, experimental verification of his theory was performed by measuring the apparent change in a stars position due to the bending of the light buy the suns gravity.
So what is all this trying to tell us? Planets, satellites, etc orbit their parents in predictable trajectories allowing us to know where they will be at any given time. A set of coordinates showing the location of these objects over a period of time is called its ephemeris.
Since the Earth is not a perfect sphere (its an Oblate Spheroid), satellites drift from their predicted position due to the Earths non-spherical shape. Also at low Earth orbits, the atmosphere creates a drag on the satellite also causing a drift (perturbation) in its orbit. At higher altitudes, such as a geosynchronous orbit, the solar wind and effects from the moon are more pronounced.
This requires us to update the ephemeris periodically.
I am still wondering about gravitational red shift, which has been observed, and the Hubble red shift, which has not been satisfactorily explained. Hubble's red shift gives the age of the universe as a billion years, but other information indicates 14 billion years.
Love that brainy stuff.
Sure.:)
Nicely put. You're a credit to your species, earthling.
Sure... some "scientists" think they understand the workings of the galaxy so much... and yet any two mere drunks home from a pub can create life out of little but beer...
Wassupwitdat?
:-)