Exactly, it isn't one or the other, its lets look at all possibilities. This doesn't exclude either or give preference to either while allowing everyone to make their own conclusions. This shouldn't be taught as a class of what is but taught as a class of what if.
Students would be required to access what they have be theorized and give written conclusions. Students would still be required to understand the known universe such as planets, comets, exploration, etc.
Well said, and thank you, TheForceofOne! Especially your sentence, "This shouldn't be taught as a class of "what is", but taught as a class of "what if"." Sorry for the added punctuation....that's just ME. LOL The Liberal agenda is all about "what floats your boat". But they are sneaky that way. They ARE biased, and they do NOT believe in open discussion and open debate unless it serves their "cause". And to be blatantly honest, their "cause" is bad, very bad.....evil, bad.....'nuf said.