Until science can explain the impossibility of creating something from nothing without any outside interference in order to even have a Big Bang theory, then the possibility of a high being or unknown entity has to be acceptable. People put faith in God just as people put faith in science and both should be accepted in theory.
How does that help? If it's a problem where the universe came from, why isn't it a problem where this God entity came from?
How's this for an oddity that evolutionists (AFAIK) prefer to keep swept under the rug:
"Francis Crick has made a further proposal. In his book "Life Itself" he, too, suggests an extraterrestrial oigin for life but believes that it is unlikely that organic molecules of any complexity could survive drifting in interstellar space. He suggests instead that life in microscopic form may have been sent to other planets by alien beings in suitable protective vessels; that life is liek a message in a bottle."
(Shattering the Myths of Darwinism by Richard Milton)
So Francis Crick, the icon of scientists everywhere, has his own theory of how life evolved. Can this be taught in schools? After all, he's a scientist, and he doesn't believe in God, so he must be all right.