If you saw a science text that listed scientific reasons the universe appears to be designed, without mention to God, would you oppose it? I ask because there are a lot of scientific reasons to support ID at least as a theory. None of these reasons resort to any religious text, or seek to support any religious view. Really, all ID is about is pointing out that scientific evidence coupled with human intellect can come to a rational understanding of the universe that includes a creator. Read "Mere Creation" and tell me ID is not about science.
If you saw a science text that listed scientific reasons the universe appears to be designed, without mention to God, would you oppose it? I ask because there are a lot of scientific reasons to support ID at least as a theory. None of these reasons resort to any religious text, or seek to support any religious view. Really, all ID is about is pointing out that scientific evidence coupled with human intellect can come to a rational understanding of the universe that includes a creator. Read "Mere Creation" and tell me ID is not about science.
_____________________________________________________________
If one wants to rationalize that this blue marble was created then I say why stop there? We might as well/better hypothisize/postulate that there was a creator of the one that created this marble. And then there is his creator too.
Whats the point or where is this leading? Who is the real God? I can't help but bring G into the discussion because the "I" in ID is referring to God.