Ping.
What we recommend," the institute says, "is that teachers and students study more about Darwinian evolution, not only the evidence that supports the theory, but also scientific criticisms of the theory."
Yea, please explain how the beginning of the world began. Was it the "Big Bang Theory"? That sure sounds scientific!
"A wide range of alternative propositions are never taught precisely because there is no structure to challenge prevailing opinion. "
Because the infrastructure of prevailing opinion is owned by communists ... the Left University. And Machivellian politics are employed to eliminate competition. Funny, with all the Anti ID effort out there, you'd think the obviousness of Darwinism would be enough for people to say, well, yes, right, the 'evidence' is just overwhelming.
A school board suffering from premature education. Strong stuff coming from the Washington Times.
What the trial is going to reveal is that ID has no research programs or proposals. It's a gut feeling without evidence or plans to acquire evidence.
So the school district need only prove that ID is not creationism to win the case? If that's true then I think the ACLU has badly miscalculated.
It's an infant that can never grow, given that a far better explanation of the observed data already exists. Anyway, it's not so much an infant as an ancient geezer in a new disguise, trying to sneak back in where he was fired for incompetence long decades past.
The one question I would have as a student is, "Can you PROVE evolution? No? Then why are you trying to cram it down our throats as an alternative to religious views that God created all things? Why do you fear religion and God? People are religious and that is fact so why not also include that fact? What are you afraid of?"