Shameless glorification of a pseudoscientist. His conclusions are based on skewed data and he has ties to the oil industry. Look into it--his cost assessments are based on maximum use of fertilizers (at rates used decades ago, much higher than current useage) and on minimum yield of corn (also based on decades old, worst case data). It's a bunch of crap and you should all look into it more before you start cheering for him.
Yeah, we should be cheering for the tax-dollar subsidized ethanol industry!
And then we can throw in a cheer for the vote buying scheme that both parties take part in for the 'corn vote'.