Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

His stance on ethanol sets Cal professor apart
Contra Costa Times ^ | 9/26/5 | Judy Silber

Posted on 09/26/2005 7:39:01 AM PDT by SmithL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 421-437 next last
To: antiRepublicrat
I still want to get a diesel and make biodiesel from the leftovers of the local fish fry place

Yeah, diesel fuel sure is easier to make than alcohol if you have a source of cheap vegetable oil. You can simply filter and preheat the fryer oil if you don't want to use the lye treatment process.
.
281 posted on 09/26/2005 11:22:55 AM PDT by radioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Hendrix
"Why should people be driving big trucks and SUVs that get 10 mpg when they could be driving full sized cars (like a camry or accord) that gets 30 mpg?"

Why should people be driving full sized cars (like a Camry or accord) that gets 30 mpg when they could be driving 'smart' cars that get 60 mpg?
282 posted on 09/26/2005 11:24:31 AM PDT by Ninian Dryhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
Ethanol is not just an energy source for vehicles, but also is an energy substrate for many humans, not to mention the adverse side effects on the central nervous system.

Whaddya mean, "adverse"? Unfortunately I'm limited on the alcohol intake side these days due to my dangerously high tri-glycerides, but I consumed enough in my younger days to make up for it.

283 posted on 09/26/2005 11:26:30 AM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Excellent idea, but I don't think it'll succeed given the cost and the energy required to make ethanol

You may be right. I think ethanol is a waste of farmland. Methanol can be produced cheaper from many more non-farm sources than ethanol.
.
284 posted on 09/26/2005 11:32:05 AM PDT by radioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
"I want my tax dollars back!"

Taxation is an irreversible process.

That "paper" though comes out of govm'ts NPR type stream.

285 posted on 09/26/2005 11:32:06 AM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Manufacturers releasing their model year cars so early into the previous year always messes me up, so I don't remember all the exact years. Still, it was a relative death trap prior to that.

In that case, it was actually released in 2003.

286 posted on 09/26/2005 11:32:13 AM PDT by BlueMondaySkipper (The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope

because full size cars are the level of control HE approves of.

Anything smaller and the government might be infringing on HIs rights as well. And he probably wouldn't like that.


287 posted on 09/26/2005 11:33:58 AM PDT by flashbunny (Do you believe in the Constitution only until it keeps the government from doing what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Tree Surgeon

As often happens when people argue with me, you editorialised my statements into something I didn't say.

I never said that people can engage in illegal activity.

Losers use the technique often.

Better luck next time.


288 posted on 09/26/2005 11:35:56 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: radioman
You can simply filter and preheat the fryer oil if you don't want to use the lye treatment process.

For that you need to modify the engine. Plus you don't get all that glycerine leftover. That plus a little more lye and some more pure fat can put you in the melt-and-pour soap business.

Or you can just break out the old chemistry set and start blowing stuff up. :)

289 posted on 09/26/2005 11:36:07 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
I got rid of it a year or so ago.

I was driving down the interstate doing maybe 5mph over the limit in the passing lane when this doofus in a Lincoln Navigator pulled up behind me and flashed his headlights. I pulled over as soon as I got around the car I was passing and this guy goes by, giving me the finger.

Well, sir, that made it personal.

I let him get a hundred yards or so in front of me and I floored it. That Navigator was doing top end of 90 mph or so (on 87 octane, I'm sure) The Nova hit 140 (on 110 octane e85, of course)

After I slowed down, it occurred to me how dumb such a stunt was for an old man and I sold the car. I ain't as good as I once was.

290 posted on 09/26/2005 11:37:40 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Nothing bizarre about it at all. The US was founded because our ancestors believed that the people of the US has the right to determine their own destinies and not be subject to the whims of a distant government and king. The system they put in place was one which allowed the people to collectively determine the paths that their society should take. That's what democracy is all about, after all..."the people" determining the fate of their own nation.

There is nothing in the Constitution which gurantees the individual the right to do whatever they want. On the contrary, the Constitution creates a framework wherein society can develop and enforce laws and norms which have the effect of permitting and prohibiting certain behaviors. The Constitution itself makes little reference to the rights of the individual, focusing instead on the rights of the people in a collective sense.

We choose to interpret many of the Constitutions protections as individual freedoms, and the courts have in many cases supported that interpretation, but it is incorrect to state that the US was founded for the purpose of guranteeing individual rights.

As I said in my first post, we prohibit all kinds of behaviors and actions for no reason other than the fact that we consider them harmful to society. If society ever determines that the inefficient consumption of oil is detrimental to us as a whole, the people would be entirely within their rights to demand that they be banned. The "Because I want to" argument holds no legal water.

The downside to living in a democracy is that EVERY right is subject to revocation at the whim of the majority. We have a representative form of government in place to help moderate this effect but when it comes right down to it, if the people in this country REALLY want to ban or permit something, there isn't anything that's going to stop them. That's the way democracy works, and IMO that's a good thing.
291 posted on 09/26/2005 11:42:45 AM PDT by Arthalion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Hendrix
>When their choices cause 3 times the pollution and I am having to breath that pollution...

You might have a point if actual pollution was related to MPG, but it is not. All cars (sold in a given state) have to meet the same pollution standards.

CO2 emission is proportional to fuel consumed, but it is not pollution.
292 posted on 09/26/2005 11:43:55 AM PDT by chipengineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

Nuclear powered stills?


293 posted on 09/26/2005 11:44:34 AM PDT by Ninian Dryhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
For that you need to modify the engine

No engine mod needed. Stick the preheater in your trunk. Start the engine on diesel and switch over when the preheater gets up to temp. Switch back to diesel and let the vegetable oil clear the system before you shut down. It's a hassle but it works.

That plus a little more lye and some more pure fat can put you in the melt-and-pour soap business

LOL!
Great idea...Sell soap to help pay for the fish oil!
.
294 posted on 09/26/2005 11:46:54 AM PDT by radioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: Hendrix

"If gasoline hits the $5/gallon mark will ethanol be more cost effective?"

Perhaps, we could make it and store as part of the stategic reserve?


295 posted on 09/26/2005 11:50:04 AM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Not bad at all!!! I love this guy!!! Thanks for posting this... Thanks very much!!!


296 posted on 09/26/2005 12:00:37 PM PDT by SierraWasp (The only thing that can save CA is making eastern CA the 51st state called Sierra Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; Dog Gone; Grampa Dave; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Southack; BOBTHENAILER

Bookmarked!!!


297 posted on 09/26/2005 12:02:02 PM PDT by SierraWasp (The only thing that can save CA is making eastern CA the 51st state called Sierra Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper

Bookmarked!!! Thank you for this Perfect Ping!!!


298 posted on 09/26/2005 12:03:07 PM PDT by SierraWasp (The only thing that can save CA is making eastern CA the 51st state called Sierra Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Bookmarked!!! Thank you for this Perfect Ping!!!

Yeah, lots of good info in the article and the posts. I need to start compiling a list of resources!

299 posted on 09/26/2005 12:11:10 PM PDT by GreenFreeper (FM me to be added to the Eco-Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

Wow, a Berkeley professor with common sense! Whodathunkit?


300 posted on 09/26/2005 12:12:22 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 421-437 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson