Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DARCPRYNCE

No amount of evidence you can present that destroys the evidence I was taught supporting evolution will ever change my blind faith, you religious nut.

Damnit, I'm distantly related to a pine tree and if you can't see that, you're a Bible thumping creationist!!! 

Owl_Eagle

(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,

 it was probably sarcasm)

3 posted on 09/26/2005 5:57:46 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Owl_Eagle

Oh yeah! Well, I'm distantly related to a cheesecake! So there!


10 posted on 09/26/2005 6:05:45 AM PDT by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Owl_Eagle

*laughing* Sarcasm is such a wonderful thing.


38 posted on 09/26/2005 6:33:44 AM PDT by DARCPRYNCE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Owl_Eagle
Damnit, I'm distantly related to a pine tree and if you can't see that, you're a Bible thumping creationist!!!

I'd have guessed your distant cousin was an oak, walnut, or pecan tree, myself! ;-P

56 posted on 09/26/2005 6:49:08 AM PDT by MortMan (Mostly Harmless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Owl_Eagle
1.) M (matter) + T (time) + E (energy) = ABIOGENESIS (the development of living organisms from nonliving matter)

Only the most rabid, frenzied, fevered intellect would wonder if this is false. Anyone who doubts the extrapolations and inferred conclusions of the intellectual giants of science is to be ridiculed as a barefoot bumpkin. To resist the smooth reasoning and self congratulatory smugness of the intelligentsia is a fools errand. The editors of all the important journals can safely dismiss your rambling as loony speculations reminiscent of pre-Darwin churchmen. To persist in a belief in a Creator, Intelligent Designer (Architect of the Universe), Father in Heaven is to be dismissed as someone worthy of consideration. Anyone who holds such a backwards opinion should not be considered for any position in the highly praised, often quoted, obviously correct, speculative areas that contribute to the education of the unwashed masses in the area of biology.
62 posted on 09/26/2005 6:53:50 AM PDT by carumba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson