Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NCLaw441
If this liberal author thinks Bush is a socialist, he should be supporting, rather than attacking, him.

Sullivan is not a 'liberal' in the modern sense. His positions are mostly congruent to that of liberals on social issues, and on some but by no means all 'liberty' issues (individual rights vs. government power.) However, Sullivan is implacably opposed to socialism, to the New Deal and to the Great Society--more so than most Republicans. Were he elected President, most Federal spending other than for Defense would be stopped by Executive Order on Day 1 of his Presidency (he would declare it Unconstitutional.) Or to say the same thing in far fewer words: He's a Libertarian.

130 posted on 09/25/2005 1:07:21 PM PDT by sourcery (Givernment: The way the average voter spells "government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: sourcery

Fair enough.


148 posted on 09/25/2005 2:13:24 PM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson