To: laz
Well, I'm certainly no CNN fan, but I've been watching both FNC and CNN. CNN has had better coverage during both hurricanes with less histrionics.
1,444 posted on
09/25/2005 7:09:05 AM PDT by
GummyIII
(If you have the ability, it's your responsibility." Marine Sgt. John Place, Silver Star recipient)
To: GummyIII
Yeah CNN has done a good job lately with the canes.
To: GummyIII
Well, I'm certainly no CNN fan, but I've been watching both FNC and CNN. CNN has had better coverage during both hurricanes with less histrionics. Well, I'm afraid I simply wouldn't know. Watching CNN is too hazardous for my health -- and the health of my tv.
1,448 posted on
09/25/2005 7:15:34 AM PDT by
laz
(They can bus 'em to the polls, but they can't bus 'em out of the path of a Cat 5 hurricane.)
To: GummyIII
"Well, I'm certainly no CNN fan, but I've been watching both FNC and CNN. CNN has had better coverage during both hurricanes with less histrionics."
I agree. I really do not watch CNN because the politics is pure socialism. But Fox has done a terrible job. I wonder if it is due to $$. Seems like if they send out a reported they need to get a report even if nothing is going on (i.e. that oldish info-babe in Galveston). They really, really have NO clue on geography. Roger Ailes, "buy your folks a MAP."
I hope they dump this Hemmer. He could get a job bailing out the ninth ward. Who cares of it take month to pump it out. People had a few days to go back and look, but if you live in a low-lying area you HAVE to be prepared to loose everything.
Now this FNC dope is talking about getting back to normal. I can tell you from Punta Gorda it takes YEARS.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson