To: filbert
One hundred votes short in the House? I think that's a lot.
942 posted on
09/24/2005 10:59:48 AM PDT by
socal_parrot
(Does this tagline make me look fat?)
To: socal_parrot
Can someone explian to me what he's talking about?
950 posted on
09/24/2005 11:00:41 AM PDT by
ShandaLear
(Announcing you plans is a good way to hear God laugh. Al Swearengen, 1877—Deadwood)
To: socal_parrot
Let's see, that would mean there are 167 Congresscritters that voted FOR and 268 that voted AGAINST. Consider an election year where 10-15 seats change hands is earthsaking, I would say you have the right that "100 votes short" is a lot.
965 posted on
09/24/2005 11:02:28 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
("Don't get stuck on stupid, reporters.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson