What about this wench's employer, or does Nevill own the shelter?
I was wondering about that. It was not clear if she worked for the shelter. But, to watch in her in the earlier video's she has no concern for the family who just lost everything and so wants their beloved Shuma back.
This has really angered those in the Kansas City area. They feel she is mispresenting those that live here, that her tatics are not the norm. She seems to think it would be just easier if the original family buys a new pet. Goodness gracious.
I just figured this family could use all the positive good wishes and prayers.
I googled "Independence Animal Shelter" and it appears to be a city-owned facility. I would think that the city would have a great deal of leverage and responsibility over their employee's actions. For instance, did she pay the adoption fee for the dog or did she just take it as a "perk" of the job? Has she done this kind of thing in the past or is it a common practice? Why this dog?
I just can't believe with all the adopable dogs that go through an animal shelter that she has to have this particular dog that has a family already. What an incredibly bad decision on her part.