One thing for sure, it ain't the New York Times.
We're letting the envy tortured left define the wrong debate. The really important debate is what is the optimum climate to support quality of human life and what are the least expensive technologies we can develop to get it there and keep it there. For fresh water generation, food growth, lower heating costs, fewer weather deaths, less energy consumption, and in general more wealth creation it's likely we should currently be giving incentives to create greenhouse conditions.