Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dark Knight
If what you said it true, a robot would be running the hundred with the grace of a gazelle.

Good point DK.
Or driving the Eisenhower at 80 mph, or a 14 year old Olympic gymnast on the bars, or even a hummingbird flitting about. Even a largemouth bass under the lily pads has more real time processing capability ;)

Wolf
401 posted on 09/27/2005 8:33:05 PM PDT by RunningWolf (U.S. Army Veteran.....75-78)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies ]


To: RunningWolf

There are many counter examples, face and voice recognition being two of them.

Humans aren't behind machines yet. Although I agree with Stephen Hawking that modifications to humans may be important WRT the electronic revolution. Weird times my friend!

Some people worship the clock cycle and come out with a zero.

Of course, computers are:

Intelligently Designed.

LOL

DK


I did notice that the argument was reductionist and left out so much data on what the body does, in order to fit the bias of the arguers. Things like balance, vision, tactile information, etc. Why do you think they did that?


403 posted on 09/27/2005 9:13:19 PM PDT by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson