[Vive ut Vivas]

So you limit truth to the asserter. No thanks.

My whole point is that there is no justification for asserting that something is true without some type of evidence. If the "asserter" has no evidence whatsoever, then the "asserter" has no right to assert truth.

[AndrewC]

If the "asserter" has no evidence whatsoever, then the "asserter" has no right to assert truth.

You seem to be making a try at it. How does a person who has never seen(blind) sense the truth about statements involving "blue"?