That is a blatant falsehood. Sherman's project has debunked all claims re the koran after laborious research. Since you obviously have not read the book (your comments prove that) your rejection is totally subjective. No science evident.
I said that there is a Koran code that purports to do the same thing. I did not say it does it; I said it purports to do it. And whether it is proved true, false or what have you, it still purports to do it.
You claim that Sherman had "debunked" it. Okay. Other people have purported to have "debunked" Sherman's work. I've read enough about ELS and "holy book codes" to recognize their limitations. But, as I stated, more to the point, even if is true that the existence of these supposed "codes" had such long odds, the occurrence of the improbable simply does not prove the existence of the divine. By definition.
Thanks. Oh, I am still interested in your answers to the other three questions.