Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76
Mississippi's Hood sued Allstate and four other leading insurers in the state on Sept. 16, arguing that their flood exclusions should be voided and that they should pay flood claims.

If this flies, it will set a precedent, and contract law in this country is dead.

86 posted on 09/21/2005 10:27:11 AM PDT by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cobra64
If this flies, it will set a precedent, and contract law in this country is dead.

And insurance will be so expensive no-one will be able to afford adequate coverage.

92 posted on 09/21/2005 10:29:04 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: Cobra64

no so. I think part of the issue is not the flood but the fact that insurance companies are trying to say ALL H20 damage is "flood".

Apparently Miss. law has a nuance which would require coverage. Thus when the companies entered Miss. they were on notice for the legal requiremnts.


This happens all the time with national companies which fail to account for state by state legal differences in law.

The lawyers will make out.

(in a related situation, retirees run into this when they retire and die in one state but have a will written under the laws of another state. The nuances can be very important.)


107 posted on 09/21/2005 10:34:49 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson