To: SunTzuWu
Disagree with you all on several points.
First, I don't believe that all copies of the 2.5 terabytes were destroyed. To the Clintons, among others, that information (like all information) would be a gold mine. E.g, the cheap shot on Rice and Perry (why do I think Jerry and Refrigerator here?)
Beyond that, having the information in the right hands (FBI Weldon, etc.) would allow someone to connect the dots. On this we seem to agree.
I disagree that the loss of info on AQ was inadvertent. I think there is more connect the dots info (e.g. Barbara Olsen).
58 posted on
09/18/2005 9:46:45 AM PDT by
bIlluminati
(If guns are outlawed, can we use tanks?)
To: bIlluminati
I never said anything about the info being destroyed. I said that it was not shared between DOD and DOJ. In order for any info to be useful to the clintoons, the source of that info would have to be known. The cOmmission says that AD didn't exist, therefore, no info. When we talk about Slick, we must remember what a small, shallow and petty person he truely is. Covering his own a$$ without any thought as to how it could effect anyone else is so much in his character that I can't ignore it.
61 posted on
09/18/2005 2:16:02 PM PDT by
Roccus
(Able Danger? What's an Able Danger?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson