Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Les_Miserables
Too much is riding on an unknown and we deserve better than that.

UNKNOWN??? Where have you been? He is very well known, very conservative and very stable.

91 posted on 09/18/2005 1:01:02 PM PDT by msnimje (Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: msnimje

I've been right here. He is not a known quantity and to pretend otherwise is the trap. You do not know his position on Roe, 2nd Amendment, Commerce Clause, Church and State, etc. He simply has not written his own opinions or ruled as a judge on those issues. He is a blank slate of personal judicial views and that should worry thoughtful people.. He has caveat"ed" every statement he made on Judicial restraint and the fixed nature of the Constitution. The only encouraging position he has taken was his analogy that judges should be unpires not pitchers or batters but noticably missing is where the judiciary fits when writing the rule book. We will see. I hope his champions are right but BushBots will get to eat their boots if they are wrong and that will be getting off easy. He is clearly smart enough to fence with the Democrats, why not us? It is clear he's smarter than Souter and you all thought you knew where Souter would come down and you were wrong big time.


92 posted on 09/19/2005 5:39:12 AM PDT by Les_Miserables
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson