To: COEXERJ145
17 posted on
09/17/2005 8:15:40 PM PDT by
Dog
( We haven't forgotten you Commander Michael Speicher)
To: Dog
I know that, you know that, but there are some "conservatives" who think he is.
19 posted on
09/17/2005 8:18:07 PM PDT by
COEXERJ145
(Cindy Sheehan, Pat Buchanan, John Conyers, and David Duke Are Just Different Sides of the Same Coin.)
To: Dog
Roberts is NO SOUTER. Roberts is an enigma at best, just like Ann Coulter says. Who knows where this man stands?
20 posted on
09/17/2005 8:19:09 PM PDT by
LowOiL
("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" -Benjamin Rush)
To: Dog
I agree, he's no Souter. But he's not necessarily a Scalia or Thomas either. He's somewhat of an enigma and we'll just have to wait to see how he turns out. With other picks we would already know how they'd turn out. Hopefully, that's the case with pick #2
22 posted on
09/17/2005 8:20:54 PM PDT by
jeltz25
To: Dog
Roberts is NO SOUTER Praying fiercely.
37 posted on
09/17/2005 8:48:32 PM PDT by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Hate yourself? Hate everybody else, too? You'll be at home with the Democrats!)
To: Dog
Roberts is NO SOUTER. Ann Coulter is deeply saddened.
74 posted on
09/17/2005 10:01:15 PM PDT by
peyton randolph
(Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
To: Dog
Roberts is NO SOUTER.How would we know?
Didn't Souter APPEAR to be a constructionist at the time of his nomination?
While most of us are optimistic about Roberts (including me), much of that optimism is based on hope and faith more than on fact. Facts are sparse at the moment, or they would have been drawn out at the hearings.
85 posted on
09/18/2005 6:42:17 AM PDT by
Balding_Eagle
(God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson