Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marajade

Friends can't protect you from your own statements.

You can candy coat it all you want; qualifying a guy by his income at the time is as shallow as qualifying a woman by the size of her "rack." Nobody said you can't do it; they just think it's tacky.

There is *no* amount of income that can't be spent.


1,102 posted on 09/18/2005 6:25:41 PM PDT by papertyger ("ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" ... Charles Darwin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1095 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger

read her post #1077

Have a bit of mercy and sympathy


1,106 posted on 09/18/2005 6:30:58 PM PDT by fqued (radiation comb-over)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1102 | View Replies ]

To: papertyger
You can candy coat it all you want; qualifying a guy by his income at the time is as shallow as qualifying a woman by the size of her "rack."

Neither one is shallow - they are Human Biology 101. Our subconscious minds make decisions about potential mates based on these factors and there is exactly zero point in criticizing either men or women for doing so. Attraction based on these factors is not a choice, and not something we can change by pretending they aren't important.

1,108 posted on 09/18/2005 6:37:56 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Violence never settles anything." Genghis Khan, 1162-1227)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson