So in other words if the first male had suddenly come to you with 5,000 per month your choice would have been different? How about 10,000? Or, 3000? 2500? I know you are probably going to be offended by this but I can not help it; I do not think I am the only one who understands specifically where you stand. If those are your standards, then I do not think I can effectively make you understand how much a piece of meat that makes a male feel like. The higher-priced beefstock is the choice cut. Got you. If I were a husband reading such comments I can tell you right now that I would be making alternative plans for the future as quickly as possible and reconsidering whether I could in actuality turn down that higher-pressure (more pay) position at work. I might not get a comfortable reception at the end of the day. And we males are the problem? Guess I really need to find a higher paying job as quickly as possible or I am doomed to remain celibate and unattached for the rest of My life.
No, probably not. You are totally fixated on the financial and are projecting it onto women.
see my post 1017
I think you totally misunderstood. Clearly money is a factor in marriage, and a woman should consider what her potential spouse makes.
to deny that is foolish. the person to whom you were replying implied nothing more than this. And I agree that that is a factor to be considered. In fact a woman who completely ignores the income-making potential of her potential spouse is foolish, unless she is independently wealthy.