Which is in itself a lie.
Can you show me where Boortz or Linder has admitted that their book was 'full of lies'?
It would take a quote exactly of that nature for your statement to be 'TRUE'.
Fact is, the extent of their 'mea culpa' was that they should have been more clear on one minor point.
But y'all proceed with your usual exercise in straining at gnats while swallowing smelly, stinky camels...
Fact is, the extent of their 'mea culpa' was that they should have been more clear on one minor point.Are you really trying to contend that they just weren't "clear" on the issue and that it was a "minor point"?
Actually they just admitted to one lie, but that little misrepresentation was the basis of several chapters in the book. A $1.3 Trillion misrepresentation.
Speaking of lies, note that the poster with the quaint number of 1.3 Trillion is spouting the SOS again. Nothing like a tad bit of hyperbolic overstatement.
He also doesn't undertstand what a minor issue is when confronted with one. Next thing you know he'll start his namecalling tirade.