To: KevinNuPac
Open disdain for the Constitution is open disdain for the oath of office that the supreme court justices are sworn to uphold. So why can't Roberts come in and say, you WILL state your rulings in accordance to the Constitution or disqualify yourself?
2 posted on
09/16/2005 8:06:11 AM PDT by
Bommer
To: KevinNuPac
The three judges mention attend law conferences abroad.
Among the left "legal harmonization" is a the new buzz word.
The goal is to make all laws harmonized with each other for the faciliations of one SOCIALIST world government with judges as teh final arbiters of all that is "holy".
To: KevinNuPac
He seems to be a little slow. Roberts has already said in the hearings that the concept of using foreign law is preposterous.
SO9
4 posted on
09/16/2005 8:08:45 AM PDT by
Servant of the 9
(Those Poor Poor Rubber Cows)
To: KevinNuPac
And if the Senate and House were populated with a majority of patriots, they'd pass legislation restricting the USSC from using foreign law as the basis for any decision.
If we had bacon, we could have bacon and eggs . . . if we had eggs.
5 posted on
09/16/2005 8:15:38 AM PDT by
savedbygrace
("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
To: KevinNuPac
Just tells me that Kennedy, Ginsberg and Breyer haven't the brains or legal expertise to use the US Constitution as solutions to all that comes before the Court. Look at the mess we are becoming, check this mess with foreign countries, and we have the answer. Do we want to become like the foreign countries or shall we get back to returning to our own? Dump liberals. Next thing these three nuts will do is adopt stoning as capital punishment.
7 posted on
09/16/2005 8:23:52 AM PDT by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
To: KevinNuPac
This court is full of hypocrisy! Didn't SCJ Scalia write a scathing dissent about the Simmons death penalty for minor's case? I do believe he countered with something along the lines of "only six other countries in the world allow abortion past the 1st tri-mester"......in response to the majorities contention that we should listen to WORLD OPINION! If Kennedy, Ginsberg, and Bryer feel we should reshape our laws after world opinion and not the US constitution then the first order of business to comply with the rest of the world would be to overturn Roe v Wade.
9 posted on
09/16/2005 8:42:40 AM PDT by
clifcrds
(There Are None So Blind Than Those Who Will Not See)
To: KevinNuPac
Kennedy, Ginsberg and Breyer wish to look for their legal remedies outside our borders. In the last couple of months there was a story in the news from some country where judges who made bad decisions were dragged through the streets until they were dead.
To: KevinNuPac
The fact that a prospective justice would need to reassure us on this point means that the point is already lost and cannot be regained. Because once the justice is on the court he is not bound by his promise.
15 posted on
09/16/2005 4:02:10 PM PDT by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson