[M1911A1]

I'm sure he does, based on his reply. Certainly it was more detailed than what I would expect in the post Bork environment.

I'm just wondering, are there a lot of judges on Robert's level who wouldn't have detailed knowledge of Miller, or are they all concentrated in the 9th circuit? :-)

[spunkets]

"I'm just wondering, are there a lot of judges on Robert's level who wouldn't have detailed knowledge of Miller, or are they all concentrated in the 9th circuit? :-)"

I don't think any of them have a lack of knowledge. It's their reference points and subsequently understanding that differs. Others don't care, because they hold a living Constitution. In that case only their particular ends matter and BS is gathered and formed to fit the con.

Bork saw the right as a community right, essentially the same as the 9th did. Bork claimed the founders tossed in the 2nd to prevent the feds from disarming the States. The commonality in proponents of this claim is that they are first and formost, authoritarians.