We shouldn't be shocked that it was Feingold assigned to do the dirty, precarious questioning on the 2nd Amendment.
All these scumbags get together beforehand and divy-up the questions they think ought to be asked, and whether or not their constituents and major donors would have a problem with it.
Apparently, after learning the lessons of losing election after election where they pressed their anti-gun agenda, and LOST - they are being much more reserved in the raising of this issue.
Hence, the USUAL attack dogs on our 2nd Amendment rights, Schumer and Feinstein, are taking the easy route due to their constituents and major donors being more left-wing and anti-gun that Feingold's.
I don't know if this is fact, but I believe it is what these gun-grabbing scumbags are up to.
It also may be that Feingold ISN'T up for re-election next time around, and the others are, OR, Feingold IS up for re-election, and the people in his district are more pro-gun than he NORMALLY (when not up for re-election) is. Ala Hillary, he may be juking to the right in an effort to get re-elected. Just like Kerry, he's probably a lying-sack-of-sh*t when it comes to his views on the 2nd Amendment and firearms owned by law-abiding citizens.
Anti-gun, anti-freedom, anti-AMERICAN maggots.
Apologies to weasels.
a look at feingold's rating by GOA and brady shows that he is on the side of gun owners 10% of the time and on the side of brady 75% of the time..
if he was truly a pro-gun, he would know that us v miller wasn't a collective/ individual right case.