Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Airborne1986

I love the idea, in general, but have one bit of confusion.

Why did it take America less than 1 decade to go from NOTHING to the Moon in the 60's - with primitive computers & electronics & no space experiance, but this new plan is going to take more than a decade to get to where we were 30+ years ago? And now we have lots of experiance & much better technology?

I think there's a good possibility that some private enterprise effort will beat NASA back to the moon.


18 posted on 09/15/2005 12:02:32 PM PDT by azemt (9 people in black robes are NOT the ultimate source of wisdom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: azemt

I bet the the "tinfoil" moon hoax people are loving this.


27 posted on 09/15/2005 12:07:18 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: azemt

a,
Primitive by today's standards, no doubt. You know, I read once that all the computation, software, and other thinkery that went into the 1969 mission would fit on a single CD.

Funny thing is, kids today can't go to elementary school without their parents thinking they'll be morons without high speed laptops.

Humanity did alot of neat stuff before microchips.


39 posted on 09/15/2005 12:19:08 PM PDT by Gefreiter ("Are you drinking 1% because you think you're fat?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: azemt

We have to do an Environmental Impact Statement on the moon first. Gotta make sure no lunar field mice get harmed when our lunar landers touch down.


100 posted on 09/19/2005 12:59:32 PM PDT by Betis70 (Every generation needs a new revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson