SCOTUSblog has a far more objective analysis
http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/
Roberts is quite clearly not a strict constructionist. And I think that is a good thing. The man appears to have a well balanced view of the law. He is pragmatic.
Precisely what we need.
(Roberts is) a believer that the Constitution changes over time – that it is in some ways a living document.
The Constitution is absolutely, positively NOT a living document!!!! If changes are required, the ammendment process is provided - NOT some unelected liberal judicial activist!