To: SolomoninSouthDakota
My take is different.
President Bush has sinking poll numbers, runaway gasoline prices, millions of invaders entering our nation illegally, etc. With a weakened President Bush, the next nomination to SCOTUS will end up being a woman and a liberal.
Instead of two originalists/Constitutionalists, Bush will end up nominating another moderate/liberal (another Kennedy in Roberts) and a woman Marxist in disguise, like Clement (another Ginsberg).
With Bush in such a weak position, he will not nominate a Luttig, a Brown or a Jones, i.e., a true conservative. This is why the RATs are causing the hysteria. They know if they weaken Bush (or, Bush weakens himself with stupid comments like "I'm responsible and take all the blame for New Orleans), then Bush will be afraid to name a true Constitutionalist with his second pick.
BUSH SAID HE ACCEPTS ALL BLAME FOR THE NEW ORLEANS disaster! What a crock! Why does Bush insist on being a punching bag when the events are NOT his fault??? Why doesn't he turn the tide of the hysteria and flat out say the locals made major errors in decision making?
Bush's self-martyrdom will cost the conservatives seats n Congress next year. Bush is not a strong president. He is acting very weakly here on New Orleans, on border control, on energy, and on all the crucial issues important to Americans.
I am VERY dejected with President Bush's actions/non actions.
84 posted on
09/13/2005 5:30:25 PM PDT by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
With Bush in such a weak position, he will not nominate a Luttig, a Brown or a Jones, i.e., a true conservative. This is why the RATs are causing the hysteria.Right you are. Except Bush will nominate a true conservative no matter what his poll numbers are IMO. He knows what they are up to and it ain't gonna work.
139 posted on
09/13/2005 9:13:58 PM PDT by
Hattie
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson