Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reagan Man
I do find Roberts involvement in Romer v Evans to be very troubling.

You think that following a policy of always assisting one's law firm partners when they ask you a question will affect how one rules in a SCOTUS case? That's preposterous.

1,000 posted on 09/13/2005 9:45:24 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats (Roberts = CHIEF; 'Rats = GRIEF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 957 | View Replies ]


To: All

I think it's time for Biden to buy a vowel!


1,017 posted on 09/13/2005 9:47:03 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1000 | View Replies ]

To: You Dirty Rats
>>>>That's preposterous.

You don't know anything about the Romer v Evans case. I do. I live in Colorado and was right in the political middle of the case as it was happening. Romer v Evans was one of the great historical decisions by the USSC. Roberts said he found nothing immoral about assisting militant gay activists in overturning the will of the people of Colorado. I find that extremely disturbing and preposterous that any conservative wouldn't have a problem with Roberts behavior in this specific case.

1,121 posted on 09/13/2005 9:59:35 AM PDT by Reagan Man (Secure the borders;punish employers who hire illegals;halt all welfare handouts to illegals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1000 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson