To: FlashBack
The only problem with putting a third party in charge (such as the Salvation Army or Red Cross) is that these groups don't have the manpower or infrastructure to deal with $60+ billion. The additional overhead to them would eat up a sizable portion of the money, it's FEMA's job, let them do it.
8 posted on
09/12/2005 5:33:47 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
I agree. Do not give it to the Red Cross. Just another private group looking for money. I hear their centers down there are quite chaotic, leaderless. Maybe to Honore'.
11 posted on
09/12/2005 5:42:32 PM PDT by
bboop
(Facts are your friend.)
To: wagglebee
The only problem with putting a third party in charge (such as the Salvation Army or Red Cross) is that these groups don't have the manpower or infrastructure to deal with $60+ billion. Halliburton does.
13 posted on
09/12/2005 5:43:36 PM PDT by
Eagle Eye
(Liberalism is an ill fated luxury that we cannot afford at this time; it does not work in a crisis.)
To: wagglebee
Third Party = FEMA...works for me, just as long as it'snot the Blanco's, Nagin's, Landruie's of the area!!!!
18 posted on
09/12/2005 5:50:13 PM PDT by
FlashBack
(www.teamamericapac.org)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson