Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PeaRidge
You are having the same problem as your other little pal. You are misunderstanding or just simply deceptively asking the wrong question.

Well then let me try it again, Pea. I'll type real slow. Try and follow along.

You claimed that in 1860 the south accounted for 91.4 percent of all imports - $331 million out of $362 million total. If total revenue from tariffs was about $60 million then only about $6 million of that could possibly come from goods destined for the North. Follow me so far?

Now, if we look forward to the fiscal year 1861 and 1862. Total tariff revenue in FY 1861 was almost $50 million, 160% of the total 1860 imports you claim the North imported in 1860. Total tariff revenue in FY 1862 was almost $70 million, over 220% of the total 1860 imports you claim was destined for the North. How could tariff revenue grow at such an astronomical rate when so little was imported in the North? Are you claiming that in one year Northern imports increased 15 fold? Or are you claiming that the North had a 160% to 220% tariff on everything they imported? Or do you have some other explanation?

The data is that the North consumed $31 million in imported goods. What does that have to do with point of collection of tariffs?

Because, Pea, I think that we can safely say that in FY 1861 and FY 1862 the amount of imports coming through New York and Boston and destined for southern consumers approached zero. There was, after all, a rebellion going on and a blockade in place. So every dollar of tariff income collected in the North had to by on goods destined to Northern consumers, wouldn't it? And since you would have us believe that Northern imports were insignificant compared to southern imports pre-rebellion, then how do you account for the massive increase in imports in one year? Something was generating all that tariff revenue. What was it?

662 posted on 09/29/2005 3:55:36 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 644 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

"You claimed that in 1860 the south accounted for 91.4 percent of all imports -"

No I did not. Let me type very slowly for you.

I said ....."During 1860 the imports of the South were valued at $331 million.

You are jumping to the conclusion that all "imports" were European.

It wasn't, and that is why the rest of your post is junk.


684 posted on 09/30/2005 1:38:45 PM PDT by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur

"Now, if we look forward to the fiscal year 1861 and 1862."

You sound like quite the historian/economist.

By the way, your tariff revenue figures are wrong.

YEAR............Yours................Actual
1860.............$60.................$53.8
1861.............$50.................$39.6
1862.............$70.................$49.1

"Something was generating all that tariff revenue"

It was called a war.


685 posted on 09/30/2005 1:58:05 PM PDT by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson