Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lincoln holiday on its way out (West Virginia)
West Virginia Gazette Mail ^ | 9-8-2005 | Phil Kabler

Posted on 09/10/2005 4:46:12 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo

Lincoln holiday on its way out

By Phil Kabler Staff writer

A bill to combine state holidays for Washington and Lincoln’s birthdays into a single Presidents’ Day holiday cleared its first legislative committee Wednesday, over objections from Senate Republicans who said it besmirches Abraham Lincoln’s role in helping establish West Virginia as a state.

Senate Government Organization Committee members rejected several attempts to retain Lincoln’s birthday as a state holiday.

State Sen. Russ Weeks, R-Raleigh, introduced an amendment to instead eliminate Columbus Day as a paid state holiday. “Columbus didn’t have anything to do with making West Virginia a state,” he said. “If we have to cut one, let’s cut Christopher Columbus.”

Jim Pitrolo, legislative director for Gov. Joe Manchin, said the proposed merger of the two holidays would bring West Virginia in line with federal holidays, and would effectively save $4.6 million a year — the cost of one day’s pay to state workers.

Government Organization Chairman Ed Bowman, D-Hancock, said the overall savings would be even greater, since by law, county and municipal governments must give their employees the same paid holidays as state government.

“To the taxpayers, the savings will be even larger,” he said.

The bill technically trades the February holiday for a new holiday on the Friday after Thanksgiving. For years, though, governors have given state employees that day off with pay by proclamation.

Sen. Sarah Minear, R-Tucker, who also objected to eliminating Lincoln’s birthday as a holiday, argued that it was misleading to suggest that eliminating the holiday will save the state money.

“It’s not going to save the state a dime,” said Minear, who said she isn’t giving up on retaining the Lincoln holiday.

Committee members also rejected an amendment by Sen. Steve Harrison, R-Kanawha, to recognize the Friday after Thanksgiving as “Lincoln Day.”

“I do believe President Lincoln has a special place in the history of West Virginia,” he said.

Sen. Randy White, D-Webster, said he believed that would create confusion.

“It’s confusing to me,” he said.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Jeff Kessler, D-Marshall, suggested that the state could recognize Lincoln’s proclamation creating West Virginia as part of the June 20 state holiday observance for the state’s birthday.

Proponents of the measure to eliminate a state holiday contend that the numerous paid holidays - as many as 14 in election years — contribute to inefficiencies in state government.

To contact staff writer Phil Kabler, use e-mail or call 348-1220.


TOPICS: Government; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: abelincoln; lincoln; sorrydemocrats; westvirginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 1,421-1,437 next last
To: Sensei Ern

See my post #17.


221 posted on 09/12/2005 9:31:50 AM PDT by Grand Old Partisan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
don't you wish everyone here was DUMB enough to believe your DAMNyankee PROPAGANDA??

Don't you wish that anyone believed anything you said?

Say, do you need Dr. Lubar's e-mail address?

222 posted on 09/12/2005 9:32:56 AM PDT by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: 4ConservativeJustices
Lincoln ordered the assasination of President Davis et al.

And when Patton said that he was going to go to Berlin and personally shoot Hitler (widely reported, undisputed), does that mean that FDR ordered him to do that?

223 posted on 09/12/2005 9:46:44 AM PDT by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Heyworth

Did Patton have documents on him as Dahlgren did supporting the charges?


224 posted on 09/12/2005 9:48:41 AM PDT by 4CJ (||) OUR sins put Him on that cross. HIS love for us kept Him there.(||)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
Blah, blah, blah and we have yet another collection of random syllables and words believed to be coherent by you.
You wouldn't recognize a truthful statement if it bit you in the ass.
225 posted on 09/12/2005 9:49:32 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Heyworth

Don't bother arguing about the Dahlgren canard. Neo-Confederates will grasp at any wisp to justify their hatred for the United States.


226 posted on 09/12/2005 9:52:11 AM PDT by Grand Old Partisan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan
Don't bother arguing about the Dahlgren canard. Neo-Confederates will grasp at any wisp to justify their hatred for the United States.

Nonsense, neither I nor any of those on my side here hate the United States - I personally think it's the greatest republic on earth. I just refuse to worship Lincoln as the 4th member of the Holy Trintity as some here seem to do. The facts speak for themselves.

227 posted on 09/12/2005 9:55:50 AM PDT by 4CJ (||) OUR sins put Him on that cross. HIS love for us kept Him there.(||)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit; All
yet another DUMB post from one of FR's DUMBER denizens!

why not head over to DU & join #3fan,cvn76 & wlat???

they are ALL over there waiting on you to make your usual STUPID, hate-FILLED, IGNORANT posts.

free dixie,sw

228 posted on 09/12/2005 9:57:45 AM PDT by stand watie (being a damnyankee is no better than being a racist. it is a LEARNED prejudice against dixie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: 4ConservativeJustices
You mean like the documents where Lincoln says "Kill Jeff Davis"? Oh, wait, there aren't any. There's only Dahlgren's handwritten speech and some other notations, the authenticity of which has been disputed ever since. Well, Patton's line was in a speech, too. And unlike the Dahlgren address, people actually remember hearing it.

The fact is that Kilpatrick and Dahlgren were both loose cannons. While their fantasy version of the raid might have included shooting Davis and the rest of the confederate cabinet, there's not the faintest resemblance of a smoking gun that says that Lincoln or, in fact, anyone above Kilpatrick, gave such an order. Meade's investigation came to the same conclusion.

229 posted on 09/12/2005 10:00:31 AM PDT by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: 4ConservativeJustices
There are a standard set of LIES which are repeatedly trotted out to fool the ignorant. In your further ramblings you use them to buttress your defense of the Slavers:
1) The biggest is that there was some "tyranny" directed against them that justified the insurrection. It is completely false and its absurdity is amply illustrated by the FACT that Southerners or Southern sympathizers had controlled the fedgov for its entire existence but for brief periods.
2) The next is that there was some kind of right of secession within the Constitution when not only was there NONE but the idea made the concept of a Constitution nugatory. Only a Constitutional amendment could have allowed states to leave the Union.
3) Lincoln provoked the war is the next. Easily refuted LIE.
4) There was some noble cause the Slavers were fighting for which maintained Freedom. In FACT, the only cause they were fighting for was the "right" to enslave their fellow man which was completely opposed to the idea of America as stated in the Declaration.
5) Lincoln was some sort of beast. A contemptible LIE foisted ONLY by the demented and dishonest. Lincoln was not only a leader with few equals but a humanitarian of rarely equaled eloquence and far-sighted as can be. Little wonder that millions across the globe acknowledged his greatness.
6) The War created some kind of Federal monster.
There are hundreds of others. But this whole subject is too insignificant to pursue except by the deranged.

And it is FALSE that colonists had the same rights as Englishmen since they had no representation in Parliament as true Englishmen had.

The Slavers were attempting to destroy the UNION. And they had NO such right except in the minds of the dishonest and/or demented. Not even Jefferson believed that. NONE of the Founders believed that either.

Trying to tar them with the sins of inequality when those sins were the actions of the Slavers (not limited to Southern ones either) is typically dishonest and disingenuous. Blacks were not only members of the military but full citizens with the right to vote in several of the Northern states. In NY specifically that right existed until the Jeffersonians in the state removed it over the objections of Hamilton, Jay and Burr among others. But the existence of prejudice and evil in the North does not excuse a worse in the South. And, at least, there were forces in the North working to end that Supreme Evil while the South became (it was not originally so) hellbent to defend, strengthen and expand it. HUGE difference.
230 posted on 09/12/2005 10:27:47 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: stand watie

If yOU eVeR sTuMbLe aCroSs a RatIonaL tHoUgHt pleasE sEeK HeLP aT oncE sinCe its UnFaMiLiArItY mIGhT cAuSe a stroke.


231 posted on 09/12/2005 10:31:03 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
every time you do that sort of post everyone with a brain rotflol AT you.

you remind us all that you're ONLY a hate-FILLED, arrogant,ignorant, DUMB-bunny.

free dixie,sw

232 posted on 09/12/2005 2:27:54 PM PDT by stand watie (being a damnyankee is no better than being a racist. it is a LEARNED prejudice against dixie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: Heyworth
The fact is that Kilpatrick and Dahlgren were both loose cannons. While their fantasy version of the raid might have included shooting Davis and the rest of the confederate cabinet, there's not the faintest resemblance of a smoking gun that says that Lincoln or, in fact, anyone above Kilpatrick, gave such an order. Meade's investigation came to the same conclusion.

Stoneman's raid to capture Davis failed, as did Butler's. Gen. Meade wrote his wife about Kilpatrick's denial and the authenticity of the papers, stating 'I regret to say Kilpatrick's reputation, and collateral evidence in my possession, rather go against this theory.' Previously Meade had written her about the plan stating '[t]he undertaking is a desperate one', and that 'the anxiety and distress ... of the authorities at Washington is so great that it seems to demand running great risks for the chances of success.' John C. Babcock [liaison officer at Meade's headquarters] wrote, '[l]etters found on Dahlgren's body published in Richmond papers ... [are an] Authentic report of contents.' Capt. John McEntee, who accompanied Dahlgren stated, 'the papers are correct that were found upon Dahlgren, as they correspond with what Dahlgren told him.'

Those are Union officers verifying the contents of the Dahlgren Papers - we already know that previous raids failed, and that both Dahlgren and Kilpatrick met with Lincoln separately. After meeting with Lincoln Dahlgren wrote his father acknowledging the upcoming event but could not disclose the details, he would either be a hero or dead.

The Dahlgren Papers were photographed before being forwarded, later the originals were destroyed by Lincoln's crony Stanton.

233 posted on 09/12/2005 2:33:09 PM PDT by 4CJ (||) OUR sins put Him on that cross. HIS love for us kept Him there.(||)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: stand watie

Your "all" is a tiny collection of brainless quacks. The vast majority of FR think you should have your head examined.


234 posted on 09/12/2005 2:34:04 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
don't you wish you were correct???

i performed a informal poll at FReep in DC a few months ago.

all but TWO (2) of the people questioned thought the "DAMNyankee coven" that infests these WBTS threads were a collection of WIERDOS,empty-heads, lunatics,fools,revisionists & losers. ONLY N-S (the Damnyankee Minister of Propaganda) is considered BRIGHT.

SADLY, most of the coven aren't smart enough to know that the average FReeper thinks they are PITIABLE, SILLY and/or LAUGHABLE.

imVho, MOST of the coven are PITIFUL, with the exception of one RACIST. (he is, in one word:DISGUSTING!)

since you hate us southrons so much, you should work for dixie LIBERTY!

free dixie,sw

235 posted on 09/12/2005 2:43:53 PM PDT by stand watie (being a damnyankee is no better than being a racist. it is a LEARNED prejudice against dixie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: stand watie

Any "poll" by you could be fodder for a Clown College Curriculum. The average Freeper does NOT support Treason past or present, does NOT believe in Thrashing one of our greatest leaders or any of the other crap you morons believe in. In Short you are a LIAR if you claim support for your ravings from most Freepers. Most avoid these thread PRECISELY because of raving lunacy from people like YOU. It does not take much investigation to discover that the same handful are the ONLY ones supporting the Traitors of 1861-5.

And any one that has an idea that YOU can detect intelligence is just a big fool. My worst nightmare would be that YOU thought me intelligent. Even those on the same side as you understand that YOU make no recruits to the Cause except the completely unbalanced.


236 posted on 09/12/2005 2:55:34 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: stand watie

Stand has a habit of hearing what he wants from people, including the tiny voices in his head.


237 posted on 09/12/2005 2:59:39 PM PDT by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: 4ConservativeJustices
When did Dahlgren meet with Lincoln? I know that Kilpatrick did, but I find nothing to indicate that Dahlgren did. The version Stephen Sears tells is that Dahlgren showed up at Kilpatrick's HQ looking for an assignment. And Dahlgren's letter to his father isn't exactly a smoking gun. Dahlgren would have been a hero or dead if the raid hadn't included explicit orders to kill Davis.

If the orders did come from above Kilpatrick, then it was Stanton. It's a lot more his style than Lincoln's.

238 posted on 09/12/2005 3:11:19 PM PDT by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: TexConfederate1861
It is hard to predict WHAT he would have done.

Lee considered himself a Virginian first. Washington believed that that belief was wrong, and that loyalty to country came before loyalty to state. There isn't any question what he would have done.

239 posted on 09/12/2005 3:58:52 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Washington wouldn't have supported his rebellion, especially one over slavery.

Concurring bump. In his farewell address Geo. Washington warned against the treachery his southern descendants would eventually perpetrate.

" The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth; as this is the point in your political fortress against which the batteries of internal and external enemies will be most constantly and actively (though often covertly and insidiously) directed, it is of infinite moment that you should properly estimate the immense value of your national union to your collective and individual happiness; that you should cherish a cordial, habitual, and immovable attachment to it; accustoming yourselves to think and speak of it as of the palladium of your political safety and prosperity; watching for its preservation with jealous anxiety; discountenancing whatever may suggest even a suspicion that it can in any event be abandoned; and indignantly frowning upon the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our country from the rest, or to enfeeble the sacred ties which now link together the various parts." -Washington's Farewell Address 1796

The concept that General Washington would ever support southern secession is absurd. Those who suggest otherwise are historical perverts.

240 posted on 09/12/2005 6:00:31 PM PDT by mac_truck (Aide toi et dieu l’aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 1,421-1,437 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson