Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Yeah, I respect him for this. But the joke is, domestic partners are pretty much the same thing. So woohoo, people, you've protected a word.

Not really.. the whole issue of redefining marrage for the left is a back-door to gaining all of the 'preferentail treatment' law has bestowed upon marrage for the overall benefit of social stablity. IF 'domenstic partnership' is to bestowed all of those benefits they should have to get them approved indivudally, not redefing the source clause and in effect grandfather everything from that point in. IF that is voted on and passed then so be it, but its not to be done by policial/legal manuvering.
250 posted on 09/07/2005 11:18:03 PM PDT by FreedomNeocon (I'm in no Al-Samood for this Sheiite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomNeocon
IF 'domenstic partnership' is to bestowed all of those benefits they should have to get them approved indivudally...

As they have indeed been doing for the past several years. There are two more in the pipeline, now. Hopefully, Arnold will veto these as well. Today's action should be lauded, but the fight has only begun, IMO. A lot of damage has already been done.

San Diego Union-Tribune, September 2, 2005

The state passed its first domestic partnership law in 1999 and then broadened it in 2003. The law grants registered same-sex couples many of the rights and responsibilities of marriage, including child-custody rights and obligations. Some partnerships have to be dissolved in family courts.

California's Supreme Court also ruled last month that same-sex parents have the same rights and obligations as other parents.

San Diego Union-Tribune, August 30, 2005
Officials from Equality California also expect the Legislature to pass a bill by state Sen. Sheila Kuehl, D-Santa Monica, that would extend death benefits to partners of public employees who retired before the domestic partnership law was expanded this year to include death benefits.

Under the legislation, Senate Bill 973, a retired public employee's partner could elect to have death benefits equivalent to those of a spouse if the partner can prove he or she was in a partnership with the public employee.

Last year, Equality California sponsored several bills to end discrimination, including one that required any insurance company that covered spouses in its policies to also cover domestic partners, and another that toughened hate-crime laws.

All those bills were signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the group said. The governor did, however, veto legislation that would have set up a commission that would look into building a war memorial to gay and lesbian veterans.


256 posted on 09/08/2005 12:10:26 AM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson