Just how much positive coverage did the NY Times give to Candidate Bush in 2000 and in 2004? BTW, why are so many "conservatives" all so worried about what they Dinosaur Press says? Do you think ONE day they are MAGICALLY going to quit being DNC Propaganda Whores and ACTUALLY report the news? This mindset makes me wonder if you had lived in 1943, would you of been tuning into Radio Berlin and Tokyo Rose to get the "News"? Of Course not. So why do you listen to propagandists every bit as biased at the NY Lies?
Without the NY Times doing anything but full time Bush Hate speech for the last week. Here are the RAW number of a poll that took anyone with a heartbeat over 18 and asked them these questions. A solid MAJORITY are either favorable or favorably inclined towards Bush. Now factor out the 45% that do not vote and the favorable numbers get even better for the Pres. And these are after the whole scale sucker punch the Dinosaurs threw by going right into making this political while the rest of us were thinking this was a time to be Bipartisan. Now that the Right has started putting the Facts out, these number will, like they always do, only go AGAINST the Hysteric Left. The Left is good as long as people are FEELING, once they start THINKING, rather then reacting to picture on TV, they always move to the Right. Two weeks from now when gas is back down to around $2.40 a gallon, this number will be even better for the Pres.
George W. Bush----Great Good Neither GnorB Bad Terrible NoOp
56% Favorable------10 25 21
... Do you think ONE day they are MAGICALLY going to quit being DNC Propaganda Whores and ACTUALLY report the news? This mindset makes me wonder if you had lived in 1943, would you of been tuning into Radio Berlin and Tokyo Rose to get the "News"? Of Course not. So why do you listen to propagandists every bit as biased at the NY Lies?
Ummmm, it was, like, you know, sarcasm. I didn't really think they would cover it...