Exactly what I said. People are too busy patting this guy on the back. I'd rather have them alive and known then two dead and the info gone.
Oops, sorry. Good job. I scanned the comments quickly for any mention of Megan and when I didn't see it, posted... Anyway, I'm in 100% agreement with you! If the courts handled these cases as they should've been handled, there wouldn't be any need for Megan's law. And if libs want to repeal Megan, they'd better address that first, as far as I'm concerned.
They were not in custody which means they were an immediate danger to children. Why sacrifice more children to these predators? There is no such thing as a reformed sex offender so they need to be in jail or dead.
Huh? What info?
"Exactly what I said. People are too busy patting this guy on the back. I'd rather have them alive and known then two dead and the info gone."
?
I'm not sure I understand your comment? I'm not happy about the vigilantism, but I consider their deaths a most unexpected benefit.