To: FreeKeys
That sounds great in theory, but judging from the posts of people who consider themselves objectivists or something similar, they are pretty much "live and let die" types. I don't think many of them make the distinction between altruism and benevolence.
56 posted on
09/06/2005 9:09:41 PM PDT by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: Moonman62
but judging from the posts of people who consider themselves objectivists or something similar, they are pretty much "live and let die" types. I don't think many of them make the distinction between altruism and benevolence.Then I have no more use for those types than I do for the control freaks who want to force everyone to make the contributions they or the majority or Allah or "the common good" or whoever specifies.
57 posted on
09/06/2005 9:25:12 PM PDT by
FreeKeys
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." -- Hillary Clinton, 6-28-04)
To: Moonman62
For the record, however, I have met several Ayn Rand fans who are truly good people; I don't know whether they call themselves "Objectivists" or not though.
59 posted on
09/06/2005 10:07:42 PM PDT by
FreeKeys
(There are two different kinds of selfishness, the good kind and the bad kind. Keep them straight.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson