[r9etb]

And what do YOU believe, r9?

I believe that if somebody is going to make claims about being rational and objective, then they have a responsibility to make rational and objective statements, and to defend them on an objective and rational basis.

I am playing devil's advocate, with an eye toward assessing the logic of the claims being made. As a result, I have no plans to offer any alternative views on this thread.

[Dead Corpse]

Devil's advocate? Kind of un-Christian isn't it?

The logic is there. It hasn't changed.

[FreeKeys]

I believe that if somebody is going to make claims about being rational and objective, then they have a responsibility to make rational and objective statements, and to defend them on an objective and rational basis. I am playing devil's advocate, with an eye toward assessing the logic of the claims being made. As a result, I have no plans to offer any alternative views on this thread.

Point us to a thread on which you have offered your views on metaphysics and/or epistemology with an attitude of being helpful, of suggesting to someone different ways of thinking, in order to achieve a more consistent definition of something. Or, at least one in which you have shown some kindness to another poster rather than snide, griping hostitlity. I'd like that.

[steve-b]

I have no plans to offer any alternative views on this thread.

This goes beyond ordinary chicken$#!^ -- this is what is excreted by chickens who eat other chickens' $#!^.