Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomGuy

I would prefer Scalia be elevated, and then Scalia be replaced by a staunch conservative. Following Robert's jioning the court, the overall "balance" will probably be only more slightly conservative than it had been, but that would be a win and the Dims would be hard presses to prevent it. I'm still concerned about Bush appointing his clearly liberal buddy, Gonzales. That could be coming, and would net out to a more than slight idiological shift away from conservatism, which would be a disaster.


412 posted on 09/05/2005 9:44:49 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Hate yourself? Hate everybody else, too? You'll be at home with the Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

We would have won only with a Scalia for CJ and a replacement of Stevens (or Souter, or Ginsburg). Roberts is still a "?" (surely he doesn't look like to Rehnquist) and the Supreme Court remains anti-life and anti-business, among many other issues.


438 posted on 09/05/2005 10:11:35 AM PDT by alessandrofiaschi (Is Roberts really a conservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson