[Howlin]

Given that they had three days warning and that it was 5 days before large quantities of food and water were deliveredto New Orleans and a secure atmosphere for disbursement was established it seems clear that this was slow - 8 days to get basic supplies in.

Remember while ago when you said this?

To: rdb3

Well I'm too new for my opinion to count much but for the record, I agree with you.

11 posted on 09/03/2005 7:24:03 PM EDT by gondramB

It's not because you're new; it's because you're MISINFORMED.

[maica]

Given that they had three days warning and that it was 5 days before large quantities of food and water were deliveredto New Orleans and a secure atmosphere for disbursement was established it seems clear that this was slow - 8 days to get basic supplies in.

Remember while ago when you said this?

To: rdb3



Well I'm too new for my opinion to count much but for the record, I agree with you.
11 posted on 09/03/2005 7:24:03 PM EDT by gondramB

It's not because you're new; it's because you're MISINFORMED.
32 posted on 09/03/2005 11:55:30 PM EDT by Howlin

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Has anyone ever considered that New Orleans should have had 3-5 days worth of emergency supplies inside their own saucer of a city? I only see blame of the Fed response. Never a question of the responsibility of people who LIVE in the path of hurricanes.