Actually, I thought Common Tator's post was an interesting one, with many good points. I don't want to disparage Reagan, but I sometimes tire of the need of old-time Reaganites like Peggy Noonan to disparage Bush. I think Reagan and Bush have both done a lot for our country and for the world. It seems pointless to argue which of them was better than the other.
I think and hope that Bush understands how important his SCOTUS nominations are. So far he has not compromised with the Democrats in the Senate, which so many of his Republican predecessors did. I think he will fight hard, with great political skill, to make good appointments that will begin to turn our courts around and take them out of the hands of tyrannical activists.
Dear Cicero,
Actually, I was sort of enjoying the dialogue with the poster, nyself. I don't mind going back and forth, discovering points of difference, discussing and debating those points.
Heck, that's kinda one of the big parts of FR.
On the other hand, I'm far too busy for this crap:
"Like many people who believes what the media says, you don't understand what went on in the past and what is going down now."
or this crap:
"THAT IN CASE YOU MISSED IT... IS CALLED POLITICAL CAPITAL!!!"
or getting lumped in with this crap:
"The unwashed don't understand what or why Dubya does what he does."
sitetest